Users can access records or actions they should not
Close the security gaps AI prototypes leave behind.
A polished interface does not prove an application is secure. We review the paths that protect accounts, data, payments and business operations, then fix the risks that could become incidents after launch.
Signs this service is the right next move.
API keys or environment secrets are exposed
Authentication was assembled from generated snippets
There is no clear view of security risk before launch
Technical work tied to business confidence.
Safer access
Authentication, sessions, permissions and sensitive actions are reviewed as connected controls.
Protected interfaces
We reduce avoidable exposure in APIs, inputs, data queries and client-side code.
Prioritised risk
You receive a clear distinction between urgent vulnerabilities and longer-term improvements.
What your engagement can include.
Final scope follows the diagnosis. You approve the priorities and price before paid implementation begins.
- 01Authentication and session review
- 02Role and permission testing
- 03API and input hardening
- 04Secrets and configuration review
- 05Sensitive-data flow assessment
- 06Remediation plan and implemented fixes
Built for the reality behind the interface.
AI-generated applications often combine hosted authentication, database rules, third-party APIs and client-side logic. Each part may look correct in isolation while the complete access model contains a gap. Security failures frequently appear at those boundaries.
Our review is proportionate to the product. A public marketing tool, a school platform and a payment-enabled SaaS application do not carry the same risk. We focus effort on the controls and information that matter most to your users and business.
Security is not a one-time badge. We help establish stronger patterns for secrets, permissions, validation and deployment so that future development is less likely to reopen the same class of vulnerability.
A short, accountable path to progress.
Map
We identify valuable data, privileged actions and exposed surfaces.
Test
We examine common failure paths and confirm evidence safely.
Harden
We implement agreed fixes and document remaining responsibilities.
Answers before access or commitment.
Is this a penetration test?+
The scope can include targeted security testing, but formal penetration-testing requirements must be agreed explicitly.
Can you review Supabase or Firebase security rules?+
Yes. Hosted database permissions are a common focus in AI-built apps.
Will you guarantee the app can never be hacked?+
No responsible provider can make that promise. We reduce identified risk and clearly state scope and limitations.
Can fixes be implemented after the review?+
Yes. We can combine review and remediation or separate them into approved phases.